These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 8116579

  • 21. PAPNET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: a study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Ryan MR, Stastny JF, Remmers R, Pedigo MA, Cahill LA, Frable WJ.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 8659445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears for internal quality control.
    Diehl AR, Prolla JC.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Jun; 42(4):949-53. PubMed ID: 9684583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
    Patten SF, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, Bonfiglio TA, Colgan TJ, Richart RM, Cramer H, Moinuddin S.
    Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Lorincz AT, Herrero R, Hutchinson ML, Bratti C, Zahniser D, Morales J, Hildesheim A, Helgesen K, Kelly D, Alfaro M, Mena F, Balmaceda I, Mango L, Greenberg M.
    Cancer; 1997 Apr 25; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D, Torres M, Rodríguez A, Ureña I, Estrada J, Reyes ME, Carreto AJ.
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec 25; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases].
    Vuong PN, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Marsan C, Baviera E.
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995 Dec 25; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME, Kelly D.
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May 25; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Clinical validation of interactive cytologic screening. Automating the search, not the interpretation.
    Mango LJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 May 25; 41(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 9022733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.