These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

357 related items for PubMed ID: 8126393

  • 1. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):159-71. PubMed ID: 8583195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE, Kralik JD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E, White KG.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2921590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J, Davison M, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE, Biondi DR.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
    Wogar MA, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level.
    Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jan; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1546183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8755700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE, Romano A.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 1447543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 11936248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.
    Richards JB, Mitchell SH, de Wit H, Seiden LS.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 May; 67(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 9163939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.