These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
357 related items for PubMed ID: 8126393
41. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. Mazur JE. J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3746189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates. Beeby E, Alsop B. J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate. Smith AP, Zentall TR. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm. Logue AW, Peña-Correal TE. J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. McCarthy DC, Davison M. J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice. McDevitt MA, Williams BA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios. Krägeloh CU, Davison M. J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm. Alessandri J, Lattal KA, Fantino E. Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():26-31. PubMed ID: 23206903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened. Mazur JE. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 15656723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule. Bensemann J, Lobb B, Podlesnik CA, Elliffe D. J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays. Shahan TA, Lattal KA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 11218228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations. Lieving GA, Reilly MP, Lattal KA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli. Mazur JE. J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 9821679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules. McDevitt MA, Williams BA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule. Torres LV, Araújo Sda C, Sanchez CM, Body S, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 21541116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Amount-dependent temporal discounting? Ong EL, White KG. Behav Processes; 2004 Jun 30; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice. Aparicio CF, Baum WM. J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul 30; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Self-control in mentally retarded adolescents: choice as a function of amount and delay of reinforcement. Ragotzy SP, Blakely E, Poling A. J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar 30; 49(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 3361265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer. Stagner JP, Laude JR, Zentall TR. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct 30; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]