These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 8126682

  • 1. Silicone putty diagnostic casts for edentulous patients wearing complete dentures.
    McCartney JW, Thompson GA, Goheen KL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):220-1. PubMed ID: 8126682
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preliminary silicone putty casts: diagnosis to final impression for complete dentures.
    Kinderknecht KE, Dominici JT, Clark EP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 8642537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An implant impression technique using a plaster splinting index combined with a silicone impression.
    Eid N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15583565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Original method for total edentulous rehabilitation based on Ludwigs technique. 3. Final impression and functional record of intermaxillary relations].
    Louis JP, Archien C, Ludwigs H.
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Jun; (74):44-54. PubMed ID: 1860080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials.
    Hayakawa I, Watanabe I.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 12731598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K, Davids A, Range U, Richter G, Boening K, Reitemeier B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Progress with a view to the natural delimitation of periphery of the impression for complete dentures].
    Landé A.
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1973 Mar; 27(101):139-45. PubMed ID: 4587354
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An alternative method for recording the occlusion of the edentulous patient during the construction of replacement dentures.
    Duthie N, Yemm R.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1985 Mar; 12(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 3886865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of contaminants on the adhesion of light-bodied silicones to putty silicones in putty-wash impression technique.
    Tjan AH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 May; 59(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 3290451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of accuracy of the wash impression technique to rebase and replace the resilient part of a soft-lined denture.
    Burrell CJ, Russell MD, Stewart J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 2056460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Simple technique to evaluate denture border extensions using silicone impression material.
    Alhajj MN, Marquez JR.
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2016 Sep; 62(4):213-214. PubMed ID: 29797830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
    Dounis GS, Ziebert GJ, Dounis KS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 2051350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.