These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


179 related items for PubMed ID: 8128904

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A.
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS, Jacoby LL.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K, MacLeod CM.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli.
    Long GM, Lyman BJ.
    Br J Psychol; 1987 May; 78 ( Pt 2)():151-62. PubMed ID: 3594087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retinal location and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information.
    Goolkasian P.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 6458649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: the progression of interference and facilitation.
    MacLeod CM.
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 9584429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD, Yamaguchi M, Proctor RW.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N, Cohen A, Ben-Shakhar G.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V, Roelofs A, van der Meij R.
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr 23; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z, Roelofs A, Martin RC, Meyer AS.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov 23; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.