These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

411 related items for PubMed ID: 8129252

  • 1. The disintegration of absorbable suture materials on exposure to human digestive juices: an update.
    Tian F, Appert HE, Howard JM.
    Am Surg; 1994 Apr; 60(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 8129252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
    Muftuoglu MA, Ozkan E, Saglam A.
    Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of absorbable suture materials in biliary tract surgery.
    Sugimachi K, Sufian S, Weiss MJ, Pavlides CA, Matsumoto T.
    Int Surg; 1978 Mar; 63(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 415997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F.
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The disintegration of surgical sutures on exposure to pancreatic juice.
    Mizuma K, Lee PC, Howard JM.
    Ann Surg; 1977 Dec; 186(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 304708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC, Kizil Z.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Ross G, Pavlides C, Long F, Kusaba A, Perlman M, Matsumoto T.
    Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kiilholma P, Mäkinen J, Tenho T, Pitkänen Y, Hirvonen T.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994 Dec; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of wound strength in normal, radiated and infected tissues closed with polyglycolic and chromic catgut sutures.
    Barham RE, Butz GW, Ansell JS.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jun; 146(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 653565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.