These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

406 related items for PubMed ID: 8134599

  • 1. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
    Jain KA.
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM, Laifer-Narin S, Johnson MB, Roman LD, Muderspach LI, Tyszka JM, Ralls PW.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S, White LM, Lai J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
    Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Hugol D, Hassen K, Sciot C, Truc JB, Poitout P, Vadrot D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses.
    Majeed H, Ramzan A, Imran F, Mahfooz-ur-Rehman.
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 22125988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL, López-García G.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
    Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Belle V, Fruscella E, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Ferrazzi E, Leone FP, Marret H, Tranquart F, Exacoustos C, Nazzaro G, Bokor D, Magri F, Van Huffel S, Ferrandina G, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B, Body G, Tranquart F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.