These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 8140676

  • 21. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE, Patterson JA, Kamath R, Willett G, Ahmed SW, Butterfield AB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of effects of suture materials on wound healing in a rabbit pyeloplasty model.
    Wainstein M, Anderson J, Elder JS.
    Urology; 1997 Feb; 49(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 9037292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Influence of suture material and suture technique on collagen fibril diameters in midline laparotomies.
    Höer J, Anurov M, Titkova S, Klinge U, Töns C, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V.
    Eur Surg Res; 2000 Feb; 32(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 11182620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biologic response to sutures.
    Salthouse TN.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980 Feb; 88(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 7010269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.
    Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr; 105(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9609273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Randomized comparison of chromic versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for postpartum perineal repair.
    Greenberg JA, Lieberman E, Cohen AP, Ecker JL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 15172869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Leroux N, Bujold E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Influence of suturing material on wound healing - An experimental study on dogs.
    Gazivoda D, Pelemiš D, Vujašković G, Djurdjević S.
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2015 May; 72(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 26165046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of laparoscopic closure of the bladder with barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture material in the pig bladder model: an experimental in vitro study.
    Gözen AS, Arslan M, Schulze M, Rassweiler J.
    J Endourol; 2012 Jun; 26(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 22007838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Quantitative analysis of the inflammatory reaction surrounding sutures commonly used in operative procedures and the relation to postsurgical adhesion formation.
    Bakkum EA, Dalmeijer RA, Verdel MJ, Hermans J, van Blitterswijk CA, Trimbos JB.
    Biomaterials; 1995 Nov; 16(17):1283-9. PubMed ID: 8573665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Ureteral reaction to suture material.
    Smith MW, Bartone FF, Tan EC, Gardner PJ.
    Urology; 1983 Mar; 21(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 6301130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Studies concerning the usefulness of catgut, PGA and polyester for abdominal fascia closure (author's transl)].
    Tauber R, Seidel W, Mees P.
    Res Exp Med (Berl); 1975 Jul 14; 165(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 131363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The in vitro assessment of a collagen/vicryl (polyglactin) composite film together with candidate suture materials for use in urinary tract surgery. I. Physical testing.
    Gorham SD, Monsour MJ, Scott R.
    Urol Res; 1987 Jul 14; 15(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 3824716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A model of suture-induced urolithiasis with urographic control in the bladder of the rat.
    Portilla E, Ramos A, Ramos L, de Buen N, García D, Rodríguez-Reynoso S, Larios F, Terán C.
    J Invest Surg; 1999 Jul 14; 12(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 10501079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. How do absorbable sutures absorb? A prospective double-blind randomized clinical study of tissue reaction to polyglactin 910 sutures in human skin.
    Cartmill BT, Parham DM, Strike PW, Griffiths L, Parkin B.
    Orbit; 2014 Dec 14; 33(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 25244631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The in-vitro assessment of a collagen/vicryl (polyglactin) composite film together with candidate suture materials for use in urinary tract surgery. II. Surface deposition of urinary salts.
    Gorham SD, Anderson JD, Monsour MJ, Scott R.
    Urol Res; 1988 Dec 14; 16(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 3368999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.