These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
196 related items for PubMed ID: 8148588
21. General bias and Administrative Law Judges: is there a remedy for Social Security disability claimants? Vendel JD. Cornell Law Rev; 2005 Mar; 90(3):869-809. PubMed ID: 15868693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Expert assessment in social law. Determining need for care--from the legal viewpoint]. Hennies G. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1992 Aug 25; 86(15-16):783-5; discussion 789-92. PubMed ID: 1441618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Expert assessment for long-term care--starting point for comprehensive help in medical and social rehabilitation]. Hoffmann P, Schmacke N. Gesundheitswesen; 1992 Oct 25; 54(10):618-21. PubMed ID: 1450555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [SGB VIII: Revision in occupational health since 1 January 1997]. Beck A, Rüter A. Chirurg; 1997 Oct 25; 68(10):Suppl 303-7. PubMed ID: 9453887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparison of expertises between long-term care insurance (SGB XI) and the law on ambulatory care for disabled individuals in Berlin (HPG)]. Schmitt J, Böhning D. Gesundheitswesen; 2002 Nov 25; 64(11):578-84. PubMed ID: 12442216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Legal aspects of geriatric rehabilitation]. Klie T. Z Gerontol; 1992 Nov 25; 25(4):223-30. PubMed ID: 1413960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Quality criteria and quality standards--social medicine expert assessment and its effectiveness in the social insurance system]. Schulte R. Gesundheitswesen; 1998 Jan 25; 60(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9522559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Expert assessment of rehabilitation for social medicine legal experts--a discussion contribution to quality assurance. From the Quality Management Study Group of the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention]. Berg A, Hackhausen W, Jochheim KA, Leistner K, Schreiber U. Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1999 May 25; 38(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 10413803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Conversion of results of expert evaluation in disputed work disability(section 275 paragraph 1a SGB V regulation)]. Seger W. Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Apr 25; 58(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 8688574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Section 51 SGBV--possibilities from the social medicine viewpoint]. Borris M. Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Jun 25; 56(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 8061458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Goals in social medicine education for the practicing physician from the viewpoint of social security pensions]. Karoff MJ. Gesundheitswesen; 1993 Nov 25; 55 Suppl 2():69-71. PubMed ID: 8298217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Structural and normative problems in recording medical facts in a structured social security system]. Haase KP. Gesundheitswesen; 1998 Apr 25; 60(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 9617006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Neurosis and social law]. Foerster K. Nervenarzt; 1984 Jul 25; 55(7):335-41. PubMed ID: 6472523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Introduction to the topic: medial evaluation of severely handicapped and blind persons in legislation]. Rohrschneider K. Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun 25; 104(6):455-6. PubMed ID: 17505831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. ["The German Social Code Book 9, SGB 9 in Practice"--40th Contact Seminar of Deutsche Sozialrechtsverband February 18-20, 2008 in Kassel]. Piepenstock K. Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Aug 25; 47(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 18704875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]