These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


483 related items for PubMed ID: 8153556

  • 1. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Aug; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Sep; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Sep; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.