These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 8153567

  • 1. Signal processing for hearing impairment.
    Levitt H, Bakke M, Kates J, Neuman A, Schwander T, Weiss M.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():7-19. PubMed ID: 8153567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG, Liu S.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH, Robinette MS, Chabries DM, Christiansen RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Jun; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA, Soede W, Berkhout AJ.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Oct; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A, Van Deun L, Eftaxiadis K, Laneau J, Moonen M, van Dijk B, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N, Frölich T, Kompis M, Bögli H, Lai WK.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Apr; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S, Erler S, Garstecki D, Dhar S.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems.
    Srinivasan S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T, Levitt H.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Dec; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.