These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
289 related items for PubMed ID: 8153862
1. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjis NS. Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs. Hickey M, Fields M. Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study]. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt C, Morawe G, Encke A. Zentralbl Chir; 1995 May; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience. Gitelis M, Vigneswaran Y, Ujiki MB, Denham W, Talamonti M, Muldoon JP, Linn JG. Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments. DesCôteaux JG, Blackmore K, Parsons L. Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]