These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 8157751

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Multipoint Technology collaborative study.
    Wheat PF, Pease AA.
    Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jul; 46(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 2691795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
    Scheftel JM, Barth JG, Vincent M.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989 Jul; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters.
    Kitch TT, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Apr; 32(4):931-4. PubMed ID: 8027345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.
    Barry AL, Gavan TL, Badal RE, Telenson MJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7040457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.
    Esaias AO, Rhoden DL, Smith PB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 7042744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Washington JA, Yu PK, Martin WJ.
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Sep; 22(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 4940867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of identification of Enterobacteriaceae by API 20E and Sensititre Autoidentification System.
    Barr JG, Hogg GM, Smyth ET, Emmerson AM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1989 Jun; 42(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 2661593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of Mast-ID 15 system for identification of fresh clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter.
    Shakespeare AP, Megson GM, Jones PA, Drucker DB, Keaney MG, Ganguli LA.
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Feb; 45(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 1541700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.