These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

99 related items for PubMed ID: 8161328

  • 1. Compromises in the visual field with the M43 aviation mask.
    Wingert TA, McAlister WH, Bachman WG.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Feb; 65(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 8161328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of combat eye protection on field of view among active-duty U.S. military personnel.
    Gunther PJ, Riddle MS.
    Optometry; 2008 Nov; 79(11):663-9. PubMed ID: 19811763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Visual field restrictions with the M17 series protective mask.
    McAlister WH, Wingert TA, Bachman WG, Buckingham RS.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):849-52. PubMed ID: 1813513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visual performance effects and user acceptance of the M43A1 aviation protective mask frontserts.
    Wildzunas RM.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Dec; 66(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 8747606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of integrated night vision goggle (NVG) helmets under sustained +Gz.
    McCloskey K, Esken RL.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Feb; 66(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 7726774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
    Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2212-21. PubMed ID: 10892865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of wearing chemical protective clothing in the heat on signal detection over the visual field.
    Kobrick JL, Sleeper LA.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1986 Feb; 57(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 3954702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A, Matsumoto C, Ohmure K, Matsumoto F, Shimomura Y.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Involuntary eye responses as measures of fatigue in US Army Apache aviators.
    LeDuc PA, Greig JL, Dumond SL.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2005 Jul; 76(7 Suppl):C86-91. PubMed ID: 16018334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distribution of retinogeniculate cells in the tammar wallaby in relation to decussation at the optic chiasm.
    Wimborne BM, Mark RF, Ibbotson MR.
    J Comp Neurol; 1999 Mar 01; 405(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 10022200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts.
    Comas M, Castells X, Acosta ER, Tuñí J.
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun 01; 21(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 16518364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb 01; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.