These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 816248

  • 1. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the effects of ticarcillin and carbenicillin upon Psuedomonas aeruginosa.
    Kalkani E, Marketos N.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan; 9(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 816248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative in-vitro activity of ticarcillin and carbenicillin against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Pearman JW, Kosaras FP, Harper WE.
    Med J Aust; 1978 Apr 22; 1(8):452-4. PubMed ID: 96319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79.
    King JD, Farmer T, Reading C, Sutherland R.
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Mar 22; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6769973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro activity of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, sisomicin and netilmicin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Watanakunakorn C, Glotzbecker C.
    Chemotherapy; 1978 Mar 22; 24(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 100282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. BL-P1654, ticarcillin, and carbenicillin: in vitro comparison alone and in combination with gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Wald ER, Standiford HC, Tatem BA, Calia FM, Hornick RB.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Mar 22; 7(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 806263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ticarcillin and carbenicillin (comparative study)].
    García Rodríguez JA, Gómez García AC, García Sánchez JE, Saenz González M.
    Rev Clin Esp; 1975 Mar 22; 146(3-4):157-9. PubMed ID: 411159
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison and evaluation of ticarcillin and carbenicillin using disk diffusion methods.
    Parry MF, Neu HC.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Apr 22; 9(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 817662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative in vitro activity of piribenicillin, ticarcillin, and carbenicillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Murakawa T, Sabath LD.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Jan 22; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 13704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae.
    Shah PP, Briedis DJ, Robson HG, Conterato JP.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar 22; 15(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 111609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Enhanced killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in presence of subinhibitory concentrations of carbenicillin and ticarcillin.
    Petit JC, Daguet GL.
    Biomedicine; 1981 Feb 22; 34(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 6784781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro activity of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and ampicillin against some gram-negative bacilli.
    Legakis NJ, Papavassiliou J.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1975 Nov 22; 28(11):912-9. PubMed ID: 811636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative activity and beta-lactamase stability of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, azlocillin, mezlocillin and cefotaxime.
    Tselentis J, Cordossis T, Kosmidis J, Lambropoulos S, Melissinos K.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Oct 22; 8(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 6271725
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of ticarcillin and carbenicillin activity against random and select populations Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Prior RB, Fass RJ.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Feb 22; 13(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 417671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Inability of carbenicillin to predict ticarcillin activity versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa by disc-agar diffusion.
    Flournoy DJ.
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Feb 22; 4(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 6811811
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative antibacterial activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin and relative stability to beta-lactamases of pseudomonas aeruginosa and klebsiella aerogenes.
    Basker MJ, Edmondson RA, Sutherland R.
    Infection; 1979 Feb 22; 7(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 108220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of inoculum size on the activity of carboxy- and ureido-penicillins and effects of combinations of ureido-penicillins with aminoglycosides against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Watanakunakorn C.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1986 Jan 22; 17(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 3081474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative activity in vitro of ticarcillin, BL-P1654, and carbenicillin.
    Eickhoff TC, Ehret JM.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Aug 22; 10(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 984764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Comparison of in vitro bacteriostatic effect of five betalactamins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (author's transl)].
    Lesage D, Delisle-Mizon F, Denis C, Vergez P, Daguet GL.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun 22; 30(6):440-3. PubMed ID: 6213917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.