PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


62 related items for PubMed ID: 8169911

  • 1. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR, Wolk BM.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Predicting Spontaneous Labor beyond 39 Weeks among Low-Risk Expectantly Managed Pregnant Patients.
    Sanusi A, Ye Y, Battarbee AN, Sinkey R, Pearlman R, Beitel D, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN, Subramaniam A.
    Am J Perinatol; 2023 Dec; 40(16):1725-1731. PubMed ID: 37225129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial.
    Amano K, Saito K, Shoda T, Tani A, Yoshihara H, Nishijima M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1999 Feb; 25(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10067011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort.
    Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):486.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22520652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Economic Analysis of Induction versus Elective Cesarean in Term Nulliparas with Supermorbid Obesity.
    Nehme L, Horgan R, Waller J, Kumar P, Barake C, Huang JC, Saade G, Kawakita T.
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2878-e2885. PubMed ID: 37949098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The ethics of induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparas in research and clinical practice.
    Azria E, Haaser T, Schmitz T, Froeliger A, Bouchghoul H, Madar H, Pineles BL, Sentilhes L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S775-S782. PubMed ID: 37633577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.
    Declercq E, Belanoff C, Iverson R.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug 12; 20(1):458. PubMed ID: 32787802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Epidemiologic considerations: scope of problem and disparity concerns.
    Getahun D.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun 12; 57(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 24614814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Choices of cervival ripening agents for elective induction in low-risk nulliparous women at term.
    Liu CH, Lee NR, Wang PH.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar 12; 63(2):152-153. PubMed ID: 38485306
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Earlier routine induction of labor-Consequences on mother and child morbidity.
    Gregersen MK.
    Health Econ; 2024 Jul 04. PubMed ID: 38965767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The journey from induction to birth and beyond.
    Savvidou M.
    BJOG; 2024 Aug 04; 131(9):1165-1166. PubMed ID: 38956448
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR, Wolk BM.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan 04; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr 04; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr 04; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
    Gelisen O, Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Ozdas E, Dilbaz B, Ozdas E, Haberal A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun 01; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Third-trimester uterine rupture after prostaglandin E2 use for labor induction.
    Maymon R, Haimovich L, Shulman A, Pomeranz M, Holtzinger M, Bahary C.
    J Reprod Med; 1992 May 01; 37(5):449-52. PubMed ID: 1507193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
    Sgayer I, Frank Wolf M.
    Harefuah; 2019 Dec 01; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR, Wolk BM.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan 01; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr 01; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr 01; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.