These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


99 related items for PubMed ID: 8177109

  • 1. An evaluation of cervical screening in general practice.
    Lewis D, Mitchell H.
    Med J Aust; 1994 May 16; 160(10):628-32. PubMed ID: 8177109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
    Wai D, Ferrier A, Collings S, Laverty C.
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan 16; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C, Mole E, Evans LJ, Rogers A.
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun 16; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Would general practitioners support a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of faecal-occult blood testing?
    Tong S, Hughes K, Oldenburg B, Del Mar C.
    Intern Med J; 2004 Jun 16; 34(9-10):532-8. PubMed ID: 15482265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting.
    Reissman SE.
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May 16; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service.
    Couzos S, Wronski I, Murray R, Cox H.
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Apr 16; 27(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 9581335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screening for cervical cancer by general practitioners in Ghent, Belgium.
    De Schryver A, Derese A, Geldhof A, Vuylsteek K.
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1989 Apr 16; 13(5-6):343-8. PubMed ID: 2743357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA, Braspenning JC, Hermens RP, Spreeuwenberg PM, van den Hoogen HJ, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Grol RP.
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr 16; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.