These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


802 related items for PubMed ID: 8178903

  • 1. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subdermal progestin implant contraception.
    Darney PD.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 1908716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Peralta O, Diaz S, Croxatto H.
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R, Hales HA, Stevenson K, Hatasaka HH, Poulson AM, Jones KP, Peterson CM.
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Vaginal bleeding patterns of women using different contraceptive methods (implants, injectables, IUDs, oral pills)--an Indian experience. An ICMR Task Force Study. Indian Council of Medical Research.
    Datey S, Gaur LN, Saxena BN.
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):155-65. PubMed ID: 7621684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
    Lynn MM, Holdcroft C.
    Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    Power J, French R, Cowan F.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul 18; 2007(3):CD001326. PubMed ID: 17636668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY, Yang YS, Tseng LH, Ko TM, Hsu MC, Chuang SM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May 18; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.
    Coukell AJ, Balfour JA.
    Drugs; 1998 Jun 18; 55(6):861-87. PubMed ID: 9617600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H, Dunson TR, Amatya RN, Begum K, Chowdhury T, Dighe N, Krueger SL, Rahman S.
    Contraception; 1993 Jun 18; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
    Segal SJ.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984 Jun 18; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I, Campodonico I, Kiriwat O, Holma P, Diaz S, Wan L, Biswas A, Viegas O, el din Abdalla K, Anant MP, Pavez M, Stern J.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec 18; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
    Buckshee K, Chatterjee P, Dhall GI, Hazra MN, Kodkany BS, Lalitha K, Logambal A, Manchanda P, Nanda UK, RaiChoudhury G.
    Contraception; 1995 Apr 18; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Injectable and implantable contraceptives.
    Cullins VE.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug 18; 4(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 1387011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Sirisumpan S, Tang-usaha J, Theppitaksak B, Dusitsin N.
    Contraception; 1996 Jan 18; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.
    Sivin I.
    Drug Saf; 2003 Jan 18; 26(5):303-35. PubMed ID: 12650633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D, Davie J, Glasier A.
    Contraception; 1998 Jan 18; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
    Peers T, Stevens JE, Graham J, Davey A.
    Contraception; 1996 Jun 18; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
    Pasquale SA, Brandeis V, Cruz RI, Kelly S, Sweeney M.
    Contraception; 1987 Sep 18; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ, Bromham DR, O'Connor TP, Sahota JE.
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul 18; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.