These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 8179786

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N, Aykent F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. In vitro tensile bond strength of adhesive cements to new post materials.
    O'Keefe KL, Miller BH, Powers JM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000 Mar; 13(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11203608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers.
    Trajtenberg CP, Powers JM.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15151340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B.
    Oper Dent; 1999 May; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [The evaluation of commercially available silane coupling agents for porcelain adhesion].
    Aida M, Kanaya H, Murata Y, Hayakawa T, Horie K.
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1990 Dec; 16(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 2134107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Influence of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic.
    Spohr AM, Sobrinho LC, Consani S, Sinhoreti MA, Knowles JC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec; 16(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 12854792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Influence of surface treatment on bond strength between a heat-activated and a light-activated resin composite.
    Guzman A, Moore BK.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Dec; 8(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 7575969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Shear bond strength of amalgam adhesives to dentin.
    Kawakami M, Staninec M, Imazato S, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y.
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9115683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.