These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

353 related items for PubMed ID: 8187750

  • 1. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB, Page GB.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP.
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comprehensive manual handling limits for lowering, pushing, pulling and carrying activities.
    Shoaf C, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, Waters T, Christensen D.
    Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1183-200. PubMed ID: 9375533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
    Hidalgo J, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, Christensen D, Huston R, Stambough J.
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S, Hamrick CA.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Kamijima M, Shibata E, Ichihara G, Ando S, Villaneuva MB, Takeuchi Y.
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes.
    Kumar S.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Dec; 37(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 7828579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A, Lee K, Aghazadeh F, Parks C.
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N, Gagnon D, Plamondon A, Shirazi-Adl A, Larivière C.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.