These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 8190882

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant RW.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
    Krämer N, Frankenberger R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Nov; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of filler content and gap dimension on wear resistance of resin composite luting cements around a CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restoration.
    Torii Y, Itou K, Itota T, Hama K, Konishi N, Nagamine M, Inoue K.
    Dent Mater J; 1999 Dec; 18(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 10786167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays.
    O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 Dec; 124(12):48-54. PubMed ID: 8277057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Mangelkramer M, Handel G.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Mar; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Marginal fit of ceramic and composite inlays in vitro].
    Reich E, Schmalz G, Federlin M.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 2269072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.