These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 8194676

  • 1. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.
    Köbler S, Lindblad AC, Olofsson A, Hagerman B.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):613-27. PubMed ID: 20707668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Li N, Rodriguez J, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1598-606. PubMed ID: 23464029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
    De Gennaro S, Braida LD, Durlach NI.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Goedegebure A, Hulshof M, Maas RJ, Dreschler WA, Verschuure H.
    Audiology; 2001 Jan; 40(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 11296937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.