These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 8225340

  • 1. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation.
    Ravazzani P, Grandori F.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 8225340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Wavelet application to reduction of stimulus artifact in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions testing].
    Chai X, Cheng J, Dong H, Shou Y, Dong M.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jun; 16(2):177-80, 188. PubMed ID: 12552658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 'Derived nonlinear' versus 'linear' click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Grandori F.
    Audiology; 1996 Jun; 35(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8864254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Time-frequency distribution methods for the analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P.
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Sep; 6(2-3):159-75. PubMed ID: 9839862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission input-output function variation in a large sample of neonates and implications for hearing screening.
    How J, Lutman ME.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Nov; 46(11):670-9. PubMed ID: 17978949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Grandori F.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Wavelet analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jun; 45(6):686-97. PubMed ID: 9609934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Spectral analysis of sounds produced by musical instruments and other sounding bodies for hearing screening of children].
    Ptok M, Sesterhenn G, Ptok A, Arold R.
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993 Jun; 45(5):229-38. PubMed ID: 8253446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. High-frequency transient evoked otoacoustic emissions acquisition with auditory canal compensated clicks using swept-tone analysis.
    Bennett CL, Ozdamar O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2410-9. PubMed ID: 20370024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Is universal newborn hearing screening more efficient with auditory evoked potentials compared to otoacoustic emissions?].
    Granell J, Gavilanes J, Herrero J, Sánchez-Jara JL, Velasco MJ, Martín G.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Apr; 59(4):170-5. PubMed ID: 18447975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Classification of technical pitfalls in objective universal hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions, using an ARMA model of the stimulus waveform and bootstrap cross-validation.
    Vannier E, Avan P.
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):669-77. PubMed ID: 16139764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Measurement of otoacoustic emissions by sound card].
    Du Y, Nie K, Liu J.
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 15884555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions. Results in hypoacusis].
    Dolhen P, Chantry P.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988 Apr; 42(5):659-69. PubMed ID: 3242353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Acoustic measurement: a tutorial for molecular biologists.
    Davis RR.
    Brain Res; 2006 May 26; 1091(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16630583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.
    Dille M, Glattke TJ, Earl BR.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov 26; 71(11):1789-95. PubMed ID: 17870187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multiscale detection of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Marozas V, Janusauskas A, Lukosevicius A, Sörnmo L.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug 26; 53(8):1586-93. PubMed ID: 16916093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the design of time windows.
    Janusauskas A, Sörnmo L, Svensson O, Engdahl B.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb 26; 49(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 12066880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. New techniques of hearing assessment.
    Martin WH, Schwegler JW, Gleeson AL, Shi YB.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Jun 26; 27(3):487-510. PubMed ID: 8065755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.