These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

106 related items for PubMed ID: 8242929

  • 1. Proprioception after knee arthroplasty. The influence of prosthetic design.
    Warren PJ, Olanlokun TK, Cobb AG, Bentley G.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):182-7. PubMed ID: 8242929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Laxity and functional results of Miller-Galante total knee prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament sparing after a 6-year follow-up].
    Besson A, Brazier J, Chantelot C, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Duquennoy A.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1999 Dec; 85(8):797-802. PubMed ID: 10637880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Proprioception after arthroplasty: role of the posterior cruciate ligament.
    Cash RM, Gonzalez MH, Garst J, Barmada R, Stern SH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Oct; (331):172-8. PubMed ID: 8895635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Effect of posterior cruciate ligament retaining or not on knee-joint proprioception].
    Wu Y, Li Y, Chen B.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 24063176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.
    Parsley BS, Conditt MA, Bertolusso R, Noble PC.
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):127-31. PubMed ID: 16950074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE, Keblish P, Sorrells RB.
    Am J Knee Surg; 1997 Sep; 10(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 9421597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Modification of the posterior cruciate ligament tension following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the Genesis CR and LCS meniscal bearing prostheses.
    Siebel T, Käfer W.
    Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 15194096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
    Sierra RJ, Berry DJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):20-3. PubMed ID: 18701240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation.
    Most E, Li G, Sultan PG, Park SE, Rubash HE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 16124972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with at least fifteen degrees of coronal plane deformity.
    Kubiak P, Archibeck MJ, White RE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 18358374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Influence of the tibial slope on tibial translation and mobility of non-constrained total knee prosthesis].
    Migaud H, De Ladoucette A, Dohin B, Cloutier JM, Gougeon F, Duquennoy A.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996 Apr; 82(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8762983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Correlation between macroscopic changes of arthrosis and the posterior cruciate ligament histology in the osteoarthritic knee.
    Stubbs G, Dahlstrom J, Papantoniou P, Cherian M.
    ANZ J Surg; 2005 Dec; 75(12):1036-40. PubMed ID: 16398804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Movement of the posterior cruciate ligament during knee flexion--MRI analysis.
    Komatsu T, Kadoya Y, Nakagawa S, Yoshida G, Takaoka K.
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Mar; 23(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 15734245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Knee kinematics in genesis total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different tibial designs with and without posterior cruciate substitution in cadaveric specimens.
    Incavo SJ, Beynnon BD, Johnson CC, Churchill DL.
    Am J Knee Surg; 1997 Mar; 10(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 9421596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Proprioception after unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.
    Simmons S, Lephart S, Rubash H, Pifer GW, Barrack R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Oct; (331):179-84. PubMed ID: 8895636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro investigation of knee joint kinematics following cruciate retaining versus cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.
    Siebel T, Käfer W.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2003 Oct; 69(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 14648953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of femoral rollback on patellofemoral contact loads in total knee arthroplasty.
    Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD.
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Oct; 16(7):909-18. PubMed ID: 11607909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation.
    Emodi GJ, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Brown TD.
    Iowa Orthop J; 1999 Oct; 19():82-92. PubMed ID: 10847521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
    Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Bertin KC, Rosenberg A, Kennedy W.
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18165027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living.
    Fantozzi S, Catani F, Ensini A, Leardini A, Giannini S.
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2222-9. PubMed ID: 17019683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.