These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


369 related items for PubMed ID: 8252675

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D, Yee R, Jones DL, Klein GJ, Mehra R.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
    Marks ML, Johnson G, Hofer BO, Bardy GH.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold.
    Swerdlow CD, Kass RM, O'Connor ME, Chen PS.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Testing different biphasic waveforms and capacitances: effect on atrial defibrillation threshold and pain perception.
    Tomassoni G, Newby KH, Kearney MM, Brandon MJ, Barold H, Natale A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 28(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 8772758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Bardy GH, Troutman C, Johnson G, Mehra R, Poole JE, Dolack GL, Kudenchuk PJ, Gartman DM.
    Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 1860210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R, Souza JJ, Chapman PD, Troup PJ, Wetherbee JN.
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans.
    Sweeney MO, Natale A, Volosin KJ, Swerdlow CD, Baker JH, Degroot P.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Thakur RK, Souza JJ, Troup PJ, Chapman PD, Wetherbee JN.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Faddy SC, Powell J, Craig JC.
    Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12867304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK, Souza JJ, Chapman PD, Troup PJ, Wetherbee JN.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
    Natarajan S, Henthorn R, Burroughs J, Esberg D, Zweibel S, Ross T, Kroll M, Gianola D, Oza A.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage.
    Tomassoni G, Newby K, Deshpande S, Axtell K, Sra J, Akhtar M, Natale A.
    Circulation; 1997 Apr 01; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.