These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep; 78(9):1371-5. PubMed ID: 8816653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations. Berkes MB, Dines JS, Little MT, Garner MR, Shifflett GD, Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Dines DM, Lorich DG. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug 06; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec 06; 75(12):1751-5. PubMed ID: 8258544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems. Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A. J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures. Papakonstantinou MK, Hart MJ, Farrugia R, Gabbe BJ, Kamali Moaveni A, van Bavel D, Page RS, Richardson MD. ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr 12; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures. Spek RWA, Schoolmeesters BJA, Oosterhoff JHF, Doornberg JN, van den Bekerom MPJ, Jaarsma RL, Eygendaal D, IJpma F, Traumaplatform 3D Consortium. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan 01; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT. Bruinsma WE, Guitton TG, Warner JJ, Ring D, Science of Variation Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep 04; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the modified Ficat classification system of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Smith SW, Meyer RA, Connor PM, Smith SE, Hanley EN. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov 04; 78(11):1702-6. PubMed ID: 8934485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Two Factors on Interobserver Reliability for Proximal Humeral Fractures. Mellema JJ, Kuntz MT, Guitton TG, Ring D. J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2017 Jan 04; 25(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 27906770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience. Foroohar A, Tosti R, Richmond JM, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul 29; 6():38. PubMed ID: 21801370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited. Majed A, Macleod I, Bull AM, Zyto K, Resch H, Hertel R, Reilly P, Emery RJ. J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Oct 29; 20(7):1125-32. PubMed ID: 21481611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus. An assessment of interobserver variation. Kristiansen B, Andersen UL, Olsen CA, Varmarken JE. Skeletal Radiol; 1988 Oct 29; 17(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 3238441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]