These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Judicial decisionmaking in the age of biotechnology. Smith GP. Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 13(1):93-120. PubMed ID: 15584150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics expert testimony: against the skeptics. Agich GJ, Spielman BJ. J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):381-403. PubMed ID: 9309551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Where law and bioethics meet...and where they don't!! Sullivan MC, Reynolds DF. Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998 Aug; 75(3):607-20. PubMed ID: 12627575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony. Merlino ML, Murray CI, Richardson JT. Behav Sci Law; 2008 Aug; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there any indication for ethics evidence? An argument for the admissibility of some expert bioethics testimony. Nelson LJ. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 33(2):248-63. PubMed ID: 16083084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert testimony by ethicists: what should be the norm? Imwinkelried EJ. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 33(2):198-221. PubMed ID: 16083080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction: bioethics in court. Rich BA. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 33(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 16083079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of bioethics testimony: guidelines for determining qualifications, reliability, and helpfulness. Spielman B, Agich G. San Diego Law Rev; 1999 Aug; 36(4):1043-75. PubMed ID: 12449932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Imwinkelried's argument for normative ethical testimony. Barnes DW. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 33(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 16083082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical ethics in the courtroom: a reappraisal. Sharpe VA, Pellegrino ED. J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 9309550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transition from fetus to infant: a problem for law and ethics. Jonsen AR. Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):697-701. PubMed ID: 11655854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Admissible expert testimony and summary judgment: reconciling Celotex and Daubert after Kochert. Razavi B. J Leg Med; 2008 May; 29(3):307-43. PubMed ID: 18726758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral discourse, bioethics, and the law. Schneider CE. Hastings Cent Rep; 1996 May; 26(6):37-9. PubMed ID: 8970801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry. Flanagan D. J Oral Implantol; 2002 May; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. America as pattern and problem. Schneider CE. Hastings Cent Rep; 2000 May; 30(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10742943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science. Haack S. Am J Public Health; 2005 May; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is bioethics broke?: on the idea of ethics and law "catching up" with technology. Shapiro MH. Indiana Law Rev; 1999 May; 33(1):17-162. PubMed ID: 12680378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioethics testimony: untangling the strands and testing their reliability. Spielman BJ. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 May; 33(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 16083081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]