These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

433 related items for PubMed ID: 8268839

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tunnel restorations using glass ionomer or glass cermet: in vitro marginal ridge fracture and microleakage.
    Shetty R, Munshi AK.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9161212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988 Feb; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A, Wilkie R, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003 Aug; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L.
    Swed Dent J; 1993 Aug; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S, Yogesh BG.
    Oper Dent; 1990 Oct; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Oct; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K, White GE.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Oct; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.