These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 8273466

  • 1. Auditory brain stem response evoked by electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant.
    Brown CD, Antognelli T, Gibson WP.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():125-9. PubMed ID: 8273466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relationship of the implant electrical auditory brainstem response threshold to the postoperative T level in children with cochlear implants.
    Kim LS, Kim SR, Heo SD, Lee MY.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():270-2. PubMed ID: 11892165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Application of intraoperative recordings of electrically evoked ABRs in a paediatric cochlear implant programme. Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Group.
    Mason SM, Sheppard S, Garnham CW, Lutman ME, O'Donoghue GM, Gibbin KP.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():136-41. PubMed ID: 8273468
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Is the round-window electrical test possible in children?
    Truy E, Morgon A, Collet L, Chanal JM, Jonas AM, Girard J, Berger-Vachon C.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():114-9. PubMed ID: 8273464
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Brain stem evoked responses by intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Robier A, Lescao Y, Beutter P.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():120-4. PubMed ID: 8273465
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrical brain stem responses in cochlear implant patients.
    Almqvist B, Harris S, Jönsson KE.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():130-5. PubMed ID: 8273467
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Telian SA.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1083-90. PubMed ID: 7917191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M, Beynon AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():99-103. PubMed ID: 21756591
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of device use after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: An electrophysiological approach.
    Sparreboom M, Beynon AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 86():161-6. PubMed ID: 27260600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The predictive value of transtympanic promontory EABR in congenital temporal bone malformations.
    Kileny PR, Kim AH, Wiet RM, Telian SA, Arts HA, El-Kashlan H, Zwolan TA.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():181-6. PubMed ID: 21756608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for Nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brain stem response test results.
    Shallop JK, VanDyke L, Goin DW, Mischke RE.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Nov; 100(11):896-8. PubMed ID: 1746823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Steady state evoked potentials: a new tool for the accurate assessment of hearing in cochlear implant candidates.
    Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, Burton MJ, Clark GM.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993 Nov; 48():44-8. PubMed ID: 8273498
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 23370566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus And N, Reeder RM.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
    Bonne NX, Douchement D, Hosana G, Desruelles J, Fayoux P, Ruzza I, Vincent C.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Auditory development in the absence of hearing in infancy.
    Gordon KA, Valero J, Jewell SF, Ahn J, Papsin BC.
    Neuroreport; 2010 Feb 17; 21(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 20042902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.