These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1056 related items for PubMed ID: 8274872

  • 1. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI.
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
    Benshoof J.
    JAMA; 1993 May 05; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A.
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec 05; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992 Dec 05; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D.
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993 Dec 05; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992 Dec 05; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH.
    Law Med Health Care; 1989 Dec 05; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
    Wing KR.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992 Dec 05; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
    Gleeson K.
    ZPG Report; 1992 Sep 05; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul 23; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion.
    Wardle LD.
    Law Med Health Care; 1989 Jul 23; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J.
    Conscience; 1998 Jul 23; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Undue burden of abortion.
    Charo A.
    Lancet; 1992 Jul 04; 340(8810):44. PubMed ID: 1351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Jul 04; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 53.