These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
691 related items for PubMed ID: 8293219
21. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade. Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case. Cook RJ. Law Med Health Care; 1989 Nov; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ. N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul 23; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD. William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996 Jul 23; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP. Dickinson Law Rev; 1993 Jul 23; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS. Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993 Jul 23; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision. Michelman FI, Redlich N, Neuwirth SR, Carty-Bennia D. Am J Law Med; 1989 Jul 23; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans. Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan 22; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Fed Report; 1991 Oct 21; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Fed Suppl; 1993 May 12; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR. J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992 May 12; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA, Carp RA, Brady DW. J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976 May 12; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion. Annas GJ. N Engl J Med; 1989 Oct 26; 321(17):1200-3. PubMed ID: 2677728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct 26; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD. Am J Law Med; 1976 Oct 26; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Mariner WK. JAMA; 1990 Feb 09; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]