These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


74 related items for PubMed ID: 8296013

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G.
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O, Avramova-Cholakova S, Beganovic A, Economides S, Faj D, Gershan V, Grupetta E, Kharita MH, Milakovic M, Milu C, Muhogora WE, Muthuvelu P, Oola S, Setayeshi S, Schandorf C, Ursulean I, Videnovic IR, Zaman A, Ziliukas J, Rehani MM.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid.
    Morán P, Chevalier M, Vanó E.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jun; 67(798):556-63. PubMed ID: 8032809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Performance measurements of mammographic systems.
    Bor D, Akyol O, Olgar T.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Jun; 129(1-3):165-9. PubMed ID: 18448439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Quality and homogeneity monitoring of radiologists in the Turin mammographic screening. Comparison of the pilot phase results].
    Milanesio L, Burke P, Frigerio A, Marra V.
    Radiol Med; 1996 Jun; 91(6):710-3. PubMed ID: 8830354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH, Jamal N, DeWerd L.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 Jun; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Marten K, Kehbel S, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Börjesson S, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Månsson LG, Medin J, Wanninger F, Panzer W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jun; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Mammography using stationary grids. Qualitative and dosimetric considerations].
    Burke P, Fasciano F, Frigerio A, Spandonari T, Temporelli A.
    Radiol Med; 1986 Sep; 72(9):660-3. PubMed ID: 3763970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the Madrid area.
    Chevalier M, Morán P, Vañó E.
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):42-8. PubMed ID: 8785620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Breast radiography: phantom, equipment performance, and radiation dosage comparisons for twenty-eight major mammography centers in the midwest. Work in progress.
    Gannon FE, Fields T, Griffith CR, Hubbard LB, Broadbent MV, Stanton L.
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):579-82. PubMed ID: 6622706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Interest of a combination of film and screen reinforcer in mammography (author's transl)].
    Berry M, Clément JF, Daniel G.
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Jan; 59(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 641872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date.
    Jensen JE, Butler PF.
    Radiol Technol; 1978 Jan; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Technical aspects of mammography.
    Nielsen B.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct; 4(5):118-22. PubMed ID: 1524970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.