These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


143 related items for PubMed ID: 8296026

  • 21. Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations.
    Stromer R, Osborne JG.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):329-48. PubMed ID: 6178786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Visual discrimination learning in mentally handicapped adults: comparative effects of two-choice and multiple-choice training methods on stimulus generalization performance.
    Griffiths P, Boggan J, Tutt G, Dickens P.
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Dec; 29 ( Pt 4)():347-57. PubMed ID: 4093962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV, McIlvane WJ.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Teaching money skills through stimulus class formation, exclusion, and component matching methods: three case studies.
    Stoddard LT, Brown J, Hurlbert B, Manoli C, McIlvane WJ.
    Res Dev Disabil; 1989 Nov; 10(4):413-39. PubMed ID: 2587830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations.
    Dube WV, McIlvane WJ, Maguire RW, Mackay HA, Stoddard LT.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 2921589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A comparison of blocked and mixed-trial methods for teaching auditory-visual discriminations.
    Bentham SN, Walker SF, Vander Pluym ME, Tejeda KN.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):534-540. PubMed ID: 30525181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.
    McIlvane WJ, Kledaras JB, Callahan TC, Dube WV.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 11936251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children.
    Boelens H, Smeets P.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 2367687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.