These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
302 related items for PubMed ID: 8300324
1. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Manders CA, Garcia-Godoy F, Barnwell GM. Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV. Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond. Newman JE, Hondrum SO, Clem DB. Gen Dent; 1996 Oct; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Garcia-Godoy F, Jesen ME. Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth. Royse MC, Ott NW, Mathieu GP. Pediatr Dent; 1996 Jun; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ, Connolly J. J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Mar; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in restorations with glass ionomer liners after thermocycling. Arcoria CJ, Vitasek BA, DeWald JP, Wagner MJ. J Dent; 1990 Apr; 18(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 2347987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior composite Class II restorations: in vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques. Donly KJ, Wild TW, Jensen ME. Dent Mater; 1990 Apr; 6(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 2079176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A. Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Oper Dent; 2001 Apr; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]