These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
157 related items for PubMed ID: 8302524
1. Quantitating cataract and nuclear brunescence, the Harvard and LOCS systems. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Friend J, Khu PM, Singer DM, McCarthy D, del Carmen J, Rosner B. Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 70(11):886-95. PubMed ID: 8302524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. LOCS III versus the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System for the assessment of nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract. Hall AB, Thompson JR, Deane JS, Rosenthal AR. Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1997 Dec; 4(4):179-94. PubMed ID: 9500153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY. Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 111(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 8512486 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of lens opacities classification system III applied at the slitlamp. Karbassi M, Khu PM, Singer DM, Chylack LT. Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 70(11):923-8. PubMed ID: 8302528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function. Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1436-43. PubMed ID: 19500847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective Assessment of Nuclear and Cortical Cataracts through Scheimpflug Images: Agreement with the LOCS III Scale. Domínguez-Vicent A, Birkeldh U, Laurell CG, Nilson M, Brautaset R. PLoS One; 2016 Aug; 11(2):e0149249. PubMed ID: 26890694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective (LOCS II) versus objective (BGS) measures of cortical and subcapsular cataracts in retroillumination photographs. Khu PM, Kashiwagi T. Ophthalmic Res; 1990 Aug; 22 Suppl 1():68-70. PubMed ID: 2388754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the lens opacities classification system II and Lensmeter 701. Rouhiainen P, Rouhiainen H, Notkola IL, Salonen JT. Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Nov 15; 116(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 8238223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparability of subjective and objective measurements of nuclear density in cataract patients. Makhotkina NY, Berendschot TTJM, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Weik ARH, Nuijts RMMA. Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun 15; 96(4):356-363. PubMed ID: 29575599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of a Scheimpflug system for lens density measurements in phacoemulsification. Kim JS, Chung SH, Joo CK. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul 15; 35(7):1204-9. PubMed ID: 19545809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods to identify incident cataract in eyes of patients with neovascular maculopathy: Submacular Surgery Trials Report No. 18. Submacular Surgery Trials Research GroupSubmacular Surgery Trials Chair's Office, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, 550 North Broadway, Suite 115, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. sstchairman@jhmi.edu, Mann AL, Bressler SB, Hawkins BS, Holekamp N, Bressler NM. Ophthalmology; 2008 Jan 15; 115(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 17574675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]