These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 8314936

  • 1. C18 thin-layer chromatographic enhancement of the 32P-postlabeling assay for aromatic or bulky carcinogen-DNA adducts: evaluation of adduct recoveries in comparison with nuclease P1 and butanol methods.
    Reddy MV.
    J Chromatogr; 1993 May 05; 614(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 8314936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nuclease S1-mediated enhancement of the 32P-postlabeling assay for aromatic carcinogen-DNA adducts.
    Reddy MV.
    Carcinogenesis; 1991 Sep 05; 12(9):1745-8. PubMed ID: 1893535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts.
    Reddy MV, Randerath K.
    Carcinogenesis; 1986 Sep 05; 7(9):1543-51. PubMed ID: 3017601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Results of an interlaboratory trial of 32P-postlabelling.
    Phillips DH, Castegnaro M.
    IARC Sci Publ; 1993 Sep 05; (124):35-49. PubMed ID: 8225506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differences in detection of DNA adducts in the 32P-postlabelling assay after either 1-butanol extraction or nuclease P1 treatment.
    Gallagher JE, Jackson MA, George MH, Lewtas J, Robertson IG.
    Cancer Lett; 1989 Apr 05; 45(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 2540901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. 32P-adduct assay: comparative recoveries of structurally diverse DNA adducts in the various enhancement procedures.
    Gupta RC, Earley K.
    Carcinogenesis; 1988 Sep 05; 9(9):1687-93. PubMed ID: 3409474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of 32P-postlabeling and HPLC-FD analysis of DNA adducts in rats acutely exposed to benzo(a)pyrene.
    Godschalk RW, Vermeer IT, Kriek E, Floot B, Schilderman PA, Moonen EJ, Kleinjans JC, van Schooten FJ.
    Chem Biol Interact; 1997 Apr 18; 104(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9158694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 32P-postlabelling analysis of small aromatic and of bulky non-aromatic DNA adducts.
    Reddy MV.
    IARC Sci Publ; 1993 Apr 18; (124):25-34. PubMed ID: 8225492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Detection of deoxyadenosine-4-aminobiphenyl adduct in DNA of human uroepithelial cells treated with N-hydroxy-4-aminobiphenyl following nuclease P1 enrichment and 32P-postlabeling analysis.
    Hatcher JF, Swaminathan S.
    Carcinogenesis; 1995 Feb 18; 16(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 7859361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. DNA adduction by phenol, hydroquinone, or benzoquinone in vitro but not in vivo: nuclease P1-enhanced 32P-postlabeling of adducts as labeled nucleoside bisphosphates, dinucleotides and nucleoside monophosphates.
    Reddy MV, Bleicher WT, Blackburn GR, Mackerer CR.
    Carcinogenesis; 1990 Aug 18; 11(8):1349-57. PubMed ID: 2387021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. 32-P-HPLC analysis of DNA adducts formed in vitro and in vivo by 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine and 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, utilizing an improved adduct enrichment procedure.
    Wohlin P, Zeisig M, Gustafsson JA, Möller L.
    Chem Res Toxicol; 1996 Sep 18; 9(6):1050-6. PubMed ID: 8870995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of immunoaffinity chromatography enrichment and nuclease P1 procedures for 32P-postlabelling analysis of PAH-DNA adducts.
    Randerath K, Sriram P, Moorthy B, Aston JP, Baan RA, van den Berg PT, Booth ED, Watson WP.
    Chem Biol Interact; 1998 Mar 12; 110(1-2):85-102. PubMed ID: 9566727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. 32P-Postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts of styrene 7,8-oxide at the O6-position of guanine.
    Otteneder M, Eder E, Lutz WK.
    Chem Res Toxicol; 1999 Jan 12; 12(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 9894023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of DNA adduct formation in white blood cells and internal organs of mice exposed to benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, safrole and cigarette smoke condensate.
    Reddy MV, Randerath K.
    Mutat Res; 1990 May 12; 241(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2333084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. 32P-postlabeling analysis of adducts formed from 1-phenylazo-2-hydroxynaphthalene (Sudan I, Solvent Yellow 14) with DNA and homopolydeoxyribonucleotides.
    Stiborová M, Frei E, Schmeiser HH, Wiessler M.
    Carcinogenesis; 1992 Jul 12; 13(7):1221-5. PubMed ID: 1638690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of 32P-postlabeled DNA-aromatic carcinogen adducts.
    Levy GN, Weber WW.
    Anal Biochem; 1988 Nov 01; 174(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 3239743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 32P-postlabeling assay in mice of transplacental DNA damage induced by the environmental carcinogens safrole, 4-aminobiphenyl, and benzo(a)pyrene.
    Lu LJ, Disher RM, Reddy MV, Randerath K.
    Cancer Res; 1986 Jun 01; 46(6):3046-54. PubMed ID: 3698023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.