These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 8314969

  • 1. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation.
    López O, Mata A, Antich M, Bassas L.
    Hum Reprod; 1993 May; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K, Saji F, Wakimoto A, Kato M, Tsutsui T, Tanizawa O.
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods.
    Hammadeh ME, Zavos PM, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W.
    Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel filtration on semen parameters.
    Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Mar; 169(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 7504330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Separation of cryopreserved human semen using Sephadex columns, washing, or Percoll gradients.
    Drobnis EZ, Zhong CQ, Overstreet JW.
    J Androl; 1991 Mar; 12(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1655686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Choosing among different technical variations of Percoll centrifugation for sperm selection.
    Ruiz-Romero J, Antich M, Bassas L.
    Andrologia; 1995 Mar; 27(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7639345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of quality of spermatozoa prepared by SpermPrep method as compared to those prepared by MiniPercoll.
    Joshi NJ, Raj JP, Sundaram GS.
    Andrologia; 1998 Mar; 30(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9629427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.
    Yamamoto Y, Maenosono S, Okada H, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N.
    Andrologia; 1997 Mar; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology.
    Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Human spermatozoa selected by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction.
    Morales P, Vantman D, Barros C, Vigil P.
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Mar; 6(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 1659585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sephadex filtration as successful alternative to density-gradient centrifugation procedures for ram sperm selection with improved kinetics.
    Galarza DA, López-Sebastián A, Woelders H, Blesbois E, Santiago-Moreno J.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 192():261-270. PubMed ID: 29580753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Separation of human semen on Percoll gradients: effect on percentage of motile and morphologically normal sperm and proportion of acrosome reacted sperm.
    Singer R, Fish B, Levinsky H, Zukerman Z, Sagiv M, Cohen A, Barnet M, Lurie BB, Lahav M.
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995 May; 40(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 7663543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Combination of direct swim-up technique and discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation for sperm preparation of oligoasthenozoospermic samples.
    Chen SU, Ho HN, Chen HF, Chao KH, Wu MY, Chen CD, Huang SC, Lee TY, Yang YS.
    Arch Androl; 1996 May; 37(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 8886259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel infiltration on semen parameters.
    Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D.
    Arch Androl; 1993 May; 31(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 7690541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
    Sharma RK, Seifarth K, Garlak D, Agarwal A.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999 May; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
    Johnson DE, Confino E, Jeyendran RS.
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Improved motile sperm recovery by a hyperosmotic Percoll gradient.
    Carbone DJ, Seifarth K, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Aug; 14(7):394-7. PubMed ID: 9285324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.
    Ng FL, Liu DY, Baker HW.
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Feb; 7(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 1315792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.