These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 8318296

  • 1. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G.
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
    Kimme-Smith C, Rothschild PA, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Moler C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Zheutlin J, Gornbein JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid.
    Morán P, Chevalier M, Vanó E.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jun; 67(798):556-63. PubMed ID: 8032809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA, Kolovos CA, Tsapaki V, Betsou S, Koliakou E, Maniatis PN, Xenofos S.
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
    Säbel M, Aichinger U, Schulz-Wendtland R.
    Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M.
    Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
    Säbel M, Ruff A, Weishaar J.
    Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D, Posedel D, Stimac D, Ivezic Z, Kasabasic M, Ivkovic A, Kubelka D, Ilakovac V, Brnic Z, Bjelac OC.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 May; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
    Adliene D, Adlys G, Cerapaite R, Jonaitiene E, Cibulskaite I.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.
    Rofo; 2007 May 07; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T.
    Rofo; 2006 Jul 07; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J, Avramova-Cholakova S, Dimov A, Lichev A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 07; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P, Chevalier M, Ten JI, Fernández Soto JM, Vañó E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 07; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS, Kelleher NM, Hoots JA, Chung JK, Fatouros PP, Benedict SH.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar 07; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.