These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 8318296

  • 21. Mammography in New Zealand: radiation dose and image quality.
    Poletti JL, Williamson BD, Mitchell AW.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Jun; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1747087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E, Alm Carlsson G.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996 Jun; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Chow S.
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R, Herdade SB, Costa PR, Terini RA, Levenhagen RS.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr 21; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct 21; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B, Andersson I, Grahn A, Håkansson M, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Båth M, Börjesson S, Medin J, Tingberg A, Månsson LG, Mattsson S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct 21; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M, Inoue S, Honda I, Yamamoto S, Ueguchi T, Ogata Y, Johkoh T.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Oct 21; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA, Fredholm U, Julin P, Rehnmark S.
    Swed Dent J; 1986 Oct 21; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C, de Villiers JF, Lötter MG, van Zyl M.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug 21; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM, Säbel M, Weishaar J, Willgeroth F.
    Rofo; 1978 Jul 21; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M, Adliene D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 21; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B, Herrnsdorf L, Andersson I, Bengtsson G, Heddson B, Olsson M.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul 21; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A, Nassivera E, Voltolini A, Volani M, Gottardi S.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep 21; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA, Weber WN.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun 21; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerations.
    Tabar L, Haus AG.
    Radiology; 1989 Oct 21; 173(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2781032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.