These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 8328455

  • 1. Linkage analysis versus association analysis: distinguishing between two models that explain disease-marker associations.
    Hodge SE.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Aug; 53(2):367-84. PubMed ID: 8328455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. What association analysis can and cannot tell us about the genetics of complex disease.
    Hodge SE.
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec 15; 54(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 7726203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH, Terwilliger JD.
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr 15; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA, Doneshka P.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996 Apr 15; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X, Elston RC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan 15; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
    Siegmund KD, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Jan 15; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The future is now - will the real disease gene please stand up?
    Martin ER, Schmidt MA.
    Hum Hered; 2008 Jan 15; 66(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 18382092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.
    Martin ER, Kaplan NL, Weir BS.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Aug 15; 61(2):439-48. PubMed ID: 9311750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA, Olson JM, Jacobs KB.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997 Aug 15; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium.
    Xing C, Sinha R, Xing G, Lu Q, Elston RC.
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug 15; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Family-based tests of association and/or linkage.
    Whittaker JC, Morris AP.
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Sep 15; 65(Pt 5):407-19. PubMed ID: 11806850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
    Sun L, Cox NJ, McPeek MS.
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb 15; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluating linkage and linkage disequilibrium: use of excess sharing and transmission disequilibrium methods in affected sib pairs.
    Wicks J, Wilson SR.
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep 15; 64(Pt 5):419-32. PubMed ID: 11281280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.