These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 8332305

  • 1. Colposcopy of adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
    Lickrish GM, Colgan TJ, Wright VC.
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 20(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 8332305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology.
    Hovadhanakul P, Mehra U, Terragno A, Taylor HB, Cavanagh D.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 1251312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. A histological entity to know].
    Fignon A, Mayelo V, Wurst C, Magnin G, Tariel D, Descamps P, Renjard L, Body G, Lansac J.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995 Jun; 24(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 7650312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
    Homesley HD, Jobson VW, Reish RL.
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD, Shingleton HM, Orr JW, Gore H, Soong SJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
    Azodi M, Chambers SK, Rutherford TJ, Kohorn EI, Schwartz PE, Chambers JT.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ, Smedts FM, Vooijs GP.
    Cancer; 2004 Aug 25; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology.
    Ronk DA, Jimerson GK, Merrill JA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May 25; 49(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 850574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M, Makarović Z, Pajtler M.
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989 May 25; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and early invasive (microinvasive) adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Jaworski RC.
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1990 Aug 25; 7(3):190-204. PubMed ID: 2171126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Zaino RJ.
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar 25; 13(3):261-74. PubMed ID: 10757337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases.
    Ostör AG, Duncan A, Quinn M, Rome R.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov 25; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Assessment of positive cytologic and/or colposcopic findings in the uterine cervix in pregnancy].
    Goebe L, Link M, Justus J.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 May 25; 48(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 3396833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.