These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 8332537
1. Effect of different adhesive systems on microleakage at the amalgam/composite resin interface. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER, Elbadrawy HE. Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 8332537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers. Berry FA, Parker SD, Rice D, Muñoz CA. Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear bond strength of composite resin to amalgam: an experiment in vitro using different bonding systems. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER. Oper Dent; 1991 Aug; 16(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 1784535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing microleakage at the junction between amalgam and composite resin: a new method in vitro. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER. Oper Dent; 1991 Aug; 16(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 1784538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A. Oper Dent; 2000 Aug; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage. Al-Jazairy YH, Louka AN. Oper Dent; 1999 Oct; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers. Maleknejad F, Moosavi H, Shahriari R, Sarabi N, Shayankhah T. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May 01; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC. Am J Dent; 1998 Aug 01; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations. Chersoni S, Lorenzi R, Ferrieri P, Prati C. Am J Dent; 1997 Jun 01; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of dentin-bonding-amalgam interfaces. Geiger SB, Mazor Y, Klein E, Judes H. Oper Dent; 2001 Jun 01; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11357565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Fruits TJ, Duncanson MG, Coury TL. Quintessence Int; 1998 May 01; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Dent Mater; 2007 Mar 01; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of filled and unfilled universal bonding agents of amalgam to dentin. Bagley A, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW. Oper Dent; 1994 Mar 01; 19(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 9028247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]