These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

93 related items for PubMed ID: 8334265

  • 1. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M, Friedrich M.
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C, Wang J, DeBruhl N, Basic M, Bassett LW.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF, Mertelmeier T.
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC, Ackerholm PH, Berlin IC, Bjurstam NG, Mattsson SL, Månsson LG, von Schéele C, Thunberg SJ.
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM, Sayre JW, McCombs MM, DeBruhl ND, Bassett LW.
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R, Arkadiev V, Diekmann F, Krumrey M.
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
    Minski M, Säbel M, Aichinger H, Joite-Barfuss S.
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography.
    Desponds L, Depeursinge C, Grecescu M, Hessler C, Samiri A, Valley JF.
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Sep; 36(9):1165-82. PubMed ID: 1946601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Dosimetric and qualitative evaluations of the use of rhodium filtration in mammography].
    Burke P, Luparia E, Frigerio A, Marra V, Milani R, Di Benedetto A, Simeone F.
    Radiol Med; 1994 Sep; 88(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 7938738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA, O'Foghludha F.
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.