These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

93 related items for PubMed ID: 8334265

  • 21. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R, Herdade SB, Costa PR, Terini RA, Levenhagen RS.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr 21; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F, Sommer A, Lawaczeck R, Diekmann S, Pietsch H, Speck U, Hamm B, Bick U.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May 07; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
    Burns CB, Renner JB.
    Radiol Technol; 1993 May 07; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
    Boone JM, Fewell TR, Jennings RJ.
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec 07; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S, Lillicrap SC, Price JL.
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct 07; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug 07; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [DIMA-magnification mammography. Phantom studies on image quality and radiation exposure of the patient].
    Hermann KP, Funke M, Brüggemeyer H, Sperner W, Gruhl T, Koch R.
    Rofo; 1997 Sep 07; 167(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 9376560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
    Paterok EM, Säbel M, Weishaar J, Willgeroth F.
    Rofo; 1978 Jul 07; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schüle E, Seeger W.
    Rofo; 1981 Aug 07; 135(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 6212315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Rothschild P.
    Med Phys; 1989 Aug 07; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG, Metz CE, Chiles JT, Rossmann K.
    Radiology; 1976 Mar 07; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
    Willgeroth F, Paterok EM, Säbel M, Weishaar J.
    Rofo; 1980 Apr 07; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M, Paterok EM, Weishaar J, Willgeroth F.
    Rofo; 1977 Jun 07; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S, Büermann L, Hilgers G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May 24; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Generators, x-ray tubes, and exposure geometry in mammography.
    Villafana T.
    Radiographics; 1990 May 24; 10(3):539-54. PubMed ID: 2343172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Mammography instrumentation: recent developments.
    Rothenberg LN.
    Med Prog Technol; 1993 May 24; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8302209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 May 24; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Large breasts, small breasts; which mammographic technic?].
    Hessler C, Depeursinge C, Grecescu M, Raimondi S, Valley JF.
    J Radiol; 1986 Feb 24; 67(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3712313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.