These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


828 related items for PubMed ID: 8337435

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Gadolinium enhanced endorectal coil and air enema magnetic resonance imaging as a useful tool in the preoperative examination of patients with rectal carcinoma.
    Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Nakamura A, Takahara T, Hachiya J, Atomi Y.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(55):131-5. PubMed ID: 15011848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
    Kim CK, Kim SH, Choi D, Kim MJ, Chun HK, Lee SJ, Lee JM.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. [Endosonography in diagnosis and staging of malignant tumors of the stomach. A prospective comparative study between endosonography, computerized tomography and conventional ultrasonography].
    Nattermann C, Dancygier H.
    Z Gastroenterol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):719-26. PubMed ID: 8310725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience.
    Kocaman O, Baysal B, Şentürk H, İnce AT, Müslümanoğlu M, Kocakoç E, Arıcı S, Uysal Ö, Yıldız K, Türkdoğan K, Danalıoğlu A.
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 25(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25599779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation.
    Chiesura-Corona M, Muzzio PC, Giust G, Zuliani M, Pucciarelli S, Toppan P.
    Abdom Imaging; 2001 Dec; 26(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11178688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion.
    Ippolito D, Drago SG, Franzesi CT, Fior D, Sironi S.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May 28; 22(20):4891-900. PubMed ID: 27239115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer.
    Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ.
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov 15; 13(22 Pt 2):6877s-84s. PubMed ID: 18006793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms.
    Cannon ME, Carpenter SL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG, Stotland B, Rosato EF, Morris JB, Eckhauser F, Scheiman JM.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jul 15; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 10385718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.