These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

311 related items for PubMed ID: 8350931

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cervical cancer screening in north-east Scotland.
    Macgregor JE, Moss S, Parkin DM, Day NE.
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):25-36. PubMed ID: 3570409
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A, Phillips N, Kan L, Matisic J, Benedet L, Towers L.
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Insurance coverage of screening mammography and Pap smears. The directors of North Carolina's University-based cancer centers speak out.
    Bast RC, Capizzi RL, Pagano JS, Wiley AL.
    N C Med J; 1991 Oct; 52(10):496-8. PubMed ID: 1944619
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pap smear screening intervals among patients with cervical cancer in West Virginia.
    Jubelirer S, Baron R, Mairs D.
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989 Oct; 293():323-30. PubMed ID: 2726944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
    Paskett ED, Tatum CM, Mack DW, Hoen H, Case LD, Velez R.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical inquiries. Is the ThinPrep better than conventional Pap smear at detecting cervical cancer?
    Andy C, Turner LF, Neher JO.
    J Fam Pract; 2004 Apr; 53(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 15068777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
    Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L.
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Disappointing effectiveness of population screening for cervical cancer].
    Giard RW, Coebergh JW, Wijnen JA.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Feb 15; 141(7):317-21. PubMed ID: 9132604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ, Chirenje ZM.
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep 15; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE.
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb 15; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Retrospective analysis of the progress of the service for early diagnosis of tumors of the uterine cervix by means of the pap-test. Year 1977-1978].
    Marnini P, Zocchi G.
    Minerva Med; 1980 May 07; 71(18):1293-6. PubMed ID: 7375053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparén P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Törnberg S.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May 07; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.