These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E. Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography]. Seifert H, Chapot C. J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D. Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Obstetric pelvimetry using digital image intensifier radiography]. Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Wischnik A, Georgi M. Rofo; 1989 Nov; 151(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 2554407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical aspects of image quality and doses in gated pulsed imaging]. Vetter S, Heckmann H, Strecker EP, Busch HP, Kamm KF, Allmendinger H. Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jul; 8(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 9759466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging. De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP; 2004 Dec; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors]. Lambruschi G, Tagliagambe A, Palla L, Torri T, D'Alessandro F, Pastori R, Barbieri L. Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters. Rampado O, Isoardi P, Ropolo R. Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar 21; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics]. Busch HP, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M. Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan 21; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov 21; 72(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19628349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality. Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Julius HW, Vrooman HA, Zoetelief J, Zweers D, Kool LJ. Radiology; 1992 Dec 21; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]