These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

305 related items for PubMed ID: 8374290

  • 1. [Initial results of a prospective study with automated solid phase and column/agglutination techniques in screening for transfusion relevant IgG antibodies].
    Simson G, Lynen R, Bialek C, Kloppmann T, Bargmann I, Köhler M.
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():52-7. PubMed ID: 8374290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Comparative study of antibody identification in the gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System), solid phase antiglobulin test (Solidscreen Capture R, Ready ID) and tube test].
    Hitzler W, Johanson C, Schömig-Brekner J, Mathias D.
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1992 Jun; 30():370-4. PubMed ID: 1284737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Positive direct antiglobulin test (DAGT) using the gel system].
    Frey-Wettstein M, Froelicher S.
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1992 Jun; 30():378-81. PubMed ID: 1284739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Solid phase techniques in blood group serology].
    Uthemann H, Sturmfels L, Lenhard V.
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():47-51. PubMed ID: 8374289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990 Jun; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W, Alraun K, Leeping M, Kirschner M, Reiser H, Heim MU.
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990 Jun; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V, Kohnhäuser T, Zimmermann R, Ringwald J, Strasser E, Zingsem J, Eckstein R.
    Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening.
    Abou-Jabal A, Shubeilat T, Hajjiri F.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 15751934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multi-centre evaluation of pre-transfusional routine tests using 8-column format gel cards (DG Gel®).
    Taylor J, Hyare J, Stelfox P, Williams M, Lees R, Maley M.
    Transfus Med; 2011 Apr; 21(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 21118316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Solid phase technique versus gel centrifugation for detection of erythrocyte antibodies--a prospective study comparison the 2 antibody detection tests].
    Zeiler T, Thiele S, Kretschmer V.
    Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1996 Apr; 33():17-21. PubMed ID: 8974691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C, Serrano-Rahman L, Vasovic LV, Mohandas K, Uehlinger J.
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.
    Lai M, Mavilia G, d'Onofrio G, Leone G.
    Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 15847655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The evolution of pretransfusion testing: from agglutination to solid-phase red cell adherence tests.
    Plapp FV, Sinor LT, Rachel JM.
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1989 May; 27(2):179-209. PubMed ID: 2656094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The gel centrifugation test: comparison of antibody identification at 37 degrees C with antibody identification at room temperature].
    Hitzler WE, Ulrich M, Däumer C, Beeser H.
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():61-3. PubMed ID: 8374292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Aggregate-hemagglutination test for anti-erythrocyte antibodies].
    Olovnikov AM, Koĭfman MM, Gorina LG, Idel'son LI.
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1975 Sep; 80(9):61-6. PubMed ID: 1083261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Antibody detection test].
    Mempel W.
    Internist (Berl); 1991 Sep; 32(9):563. PubMed ID: 1960023
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Conventional tube agglutination with polyethylene glycol versus Red Cell Affinity Column Technology (ReACT): a comparison of antibody detection methods.
    Brumit MC, Stubbs JR.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2002 Sep; 32(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 12017197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The LISS technique-a more sensitive and faster method for erythrocyte antibody detection (author's transl)].
    Smetana R.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 Apr 03; 93(7):215-8. PubMed ID: 7257415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Antibody detection in emergency transfusions. A comparison of 3 different methods].
    Heim MU, Alraun K, Hansen E, Pachmann U, Böck M, Mempel W.
    Anaesthesist; 1988 Nov 03; 37(11):680-3. PubMed ID: 3213941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of two column agglutination technologies for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique.
    Byrne T, Nolan T, O'Donnell R.
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1996 Sep 03; 53(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 8914345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.