These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 8406516

  • 1. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C, McKnight B.
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B, Tierney C, McGorray SP, Day NE.
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M, Seuchter SA, Baur MP.
    Hum Hered; 1994 Jun; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD, Gauderman WJ.
    Hum Hered; 2001 Jun; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P, Clayton D.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A likelihood ratio test for detecting patterns of disease-marker association.
    Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Curnow RN.
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(Pt 4):335-50. PubMed ID: 9365786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gene mapping of a simulated complex disease.
    Newman B, Lee M, Stillman L, Louie L, Anderson L, King MC.
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989 Jul; 329():171-6. PubMed ID: 2622949
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Linkage and association to genetic markers.
    Elston RC.
    Exp Clin Immunogenet; 1995 Jul; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 8534500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC, Elston RC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985 Jul; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Including non-informative parents in transmission-based association tests.
    Kulkarni H, Ghosh S.
    J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 62(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 28202950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: multiple-locus segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers.
    Risch N.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984 Jun; 1(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 14971378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M, Seuchter SA, Baur MP.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles.
    Badner JA, Gershon ES, Goldin LR.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data.
    Schaid DJ, Li H.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 14(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 9433633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficient strategies for genomic searching using the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.
    Brown DL, Gorin MB, Weeks DE.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Mar; 54(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 8116624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomization tests of disease-marker associations.
    Morris AP, Curnow RN, Whittaker JC.
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):49-60. PubMed ID: 9066927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
    Siegmund KD, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC, Buxbaum S, Jacobs KB, Olson JM.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
    McIntyre LM, Martin ER, Simonsen KL, Kaplan NL.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using family history information to distinguish true and false positive model-free linkage results.
    Olson JM, Elston RC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998 Jul; 15(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 9554555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.