These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 8415168

  • 1. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding.
    Summitt JB, Chan DC, Dutton FB.
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO.
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design.
    Summitt JB, Della Bona A, Burgess JO.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 8058898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD, Yetmez M, Türköz E, Akkas N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Sep; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Sep; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A, Summitt JB.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Ebert J, Lohbauer U, Käppel S, ten Weges S, Petschelt A.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.